[ Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: K Wallis
Date: 21 Oct 2007
Time: 21:47:51 -0500
Remote Name: 67.190.201.144
Hello Mark, I have found your work compelling since you first published. How do you account for improvements to level of apparent recovery (acceptable fluency corroborated by parent report) in preschool children using non-Lidcombe types of approaches? Many of us have seen great outcomes which are corroborated by parent report and seem to suggest complete recovery. Also what would be your thoughts about using Lidcombe with preschoolers in combination with other "tried and true" strategies that are yielding improving fluency (for those of us who have not had access to becoming formally trained in your methods). Thank you.