[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Lynne Shields
Date: 17 Oct 2008
Time: 09:42:40 -0500
Remote Name: 68.143.177.2
Ed, As others have pointed out, ASHA has a clearly-defined set of procedures for anyone, consumer or peer, to report unethical practice in the field of audiology or speech-language pathology. These are utilized and ASHA investigates and, if warranted, decides on disciplinary actions, which are reported in our professional publication. As Vivian stated in her response, those of us who have experience working with people who stutter make it a part of our practice to consult with other SLPs who do not have as much specific expertise in the area. I consult regularly with school SLPs in my area and give in-services in area school districts. I work with colleagues to present information on stuttering treatment at local and state conventions in my area, and help to organize support activities for children who stutter, their families and SLPs who want continuing education in fluency disorders. I know that this is happening in many locations around the country. Whenever I have an opportunity to present on the topic of fluency disorders, there is always a large audience, so I know that there are many SLPs who are eager to learn more about this disorder. Other SLPs in area hospitals and clinics refer clients to our clinic as well as to other SLPs in our area where fluency specialists are employed. So, while the system is not perfect, I see a growing awareness of ways to insure that those who stutter and who wish to engage in treatment can obtain effective services. Regards, Lynne