[ Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Tom Weidig (thestutteringbrain.blogspot.com)
Date: 07 Oct 2009
Time: 03:32:57 -0500
Remote Name: 91.148.103.45
Salmelin did this nine years ago. Why has there been no other MEG study? She said herself that MEG is very tricky because one needs to reconstruct a 3D map from 2D data. And this inverse problem is very difficult to solve. So I would wait for more or better MEG technology for a more definite conclusion. Also, I am also concerned that abnormal function could either be due to structural abnormality or due to the running of a learned behaviour. So we might activate differently because we work differently or because we activate differently due certain triggers. I view stuttering as delay being the bottle neck, the dysfunction shared by all stutterers, but caused by different causes and leading to different reactions.