[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Phyllis Quarles
Date: 02 Oct 2011
Time: 22:07:46 -0500
Remote Name: 76.17.183.48
Hello. I just want to make sure I understand something: the Pakistan family where you made the significant genetic component was a consanguineous family? If so, could it be that the "inbreeding" (I hope that's not considered derogatory)is what caused the anomaly in that particular case?