[ Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Ed Feuer
Date: 19 Oct 2011
Time: 09:00:45 -0500
Remote Name: 207.161.157.111
Query for the professors: The best answer to Rick's question, in the view of this PWS (some of the time), to the question would come through independent third-party assessment of treatment outcomes over time: one year, three years and five years. And this independent third-party assessment would involve not only assessment of the client but eliciting input on outcome from the client's family, friends and co-workers. Do not the basic rules of scientific inquiry demand such independent third-party assessment in order to claim validity? Why should consumers accept the "too-expensive" response? — Ed edfeuer@mts.net