[ Contents | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Bob Quesal
Date: 10/19/03
Time: 3:12:06 PM
Remote Name: 64.6.15.11
Hi Gene:
Before I start, let me reassure you that, at least to some extent, I am playing devil's advocate here. However, as you know, we currently are enjoined in a battle with those who say that fluency *is* what's important, and they have the data to prove it. They say that those of us who say there's more to it than fluency have "assertions" and nothing more.
So, the question is: if someone comes to you and says that Chronic Perseverative Stuttering Syndrome is nothing but a fabrication because there is no published research data to support it, how would you respond?
I hope you take this question in the spirit in which it is intended.
Best Wishes,
Bob Q.