[ Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Alan Badmington (to ReKeshia)
Date: 19 Oct 2006
Time: 14:40:29 -0500
Remote Name: 84.69.79.155
Hi ReKeshia, I’m pleased you found my article of interest and that you have gained a wider understanding of the implications of the use of technology by persons who stutter. With regard to the Edinburgh Masker, it comprised a control box, measuring approximately 3.5 inches x 2.25 inches x 1 inch (8.89 cms x 5.715 cms x 2.54 cms) and weighing about 4 ounces (113 gms); two amplifiers; several lengths of wiring and tubing; and a pair of ear moulds. When I, initially, acquired the device, it came supplied with a piece of equipment very similar to a doctor’s stethoscope. This was designed to be worn externally and fitted into the ears in full view of everyone. As a police officer, I found this to be both impracticable and aesthetically unacceptable. Within a short while, I arranged for the ear moulds to be supplied locally and discarded the ‘stethoscope’. I wore the control box in the small of my back, attached to a belt beneath my shirt. I was given permission to grow my hair longer then regulation length in order to conceal the tubing that ran from the back of my neck to the ear moulds. Every morning, I had the irksome task of affixing the microphone to my throat, immediately beneath the Adam’s apple. Consequently, I could never wear an open-neck shirt, even during the heat of summer. The constant buzzing sound frequently caused me to have headaches, while the ear moulds created intermittent ear infections and discomfort. The tubing that ran from the control box to the ear moulds restricted my neck movement, causing further discomfort. But, I wore it for 20 years because I needed its support. I hope that this description will give you a clearer picture of my mechanical crutch. Thank you for taking the time to participate inn the threaded discussion. Kindest regards Alan