Fontbonne University
Course Syllabus
Spring 2008
CDS 526 SEMINAR IN FLUENCY
DISORDERS
Section 10, 3 credit hours
Instructor:
Lynne Shields
Class
meeting time: Thursday, 4:30 – 7:00
Class
location: East 103
Instructor
office: East 210, 889-1464
Office
Hours: Tues. 12:30-1:30, Wed. 9:30-11:30 or by appointment
e-mail:
lshields@fontbonne.edu
COURSE
DESCRIPTION: A
review of terminology and theories related to the onset and development of
fluency disorders followed by in depth coverage of assessment and treatment
methods for children and adults.
LEARNING
OUTCOMES: [ ] = ASHA certification standards
The
learning activities, assignments, and exams in the course assess your mastery
of the following learning outcomes. The student will be able to:
1)
explain onset and development of stuttering and related theories. [III-C]
2)
demonstrate comprehension of current assessment and intervention methods for
fluency disorders in children and adults. [III-D]
3)
demonstrate comprehension of current issues in the treatment of stuttering. [III-G]
4)
apply knowledge concerning attitudes and emotions and its impact on stuttering
to the assessment and treatment of
stuttering. [IV-G 1;
IV-G 3]
5)
demonstrate developing-level skill in the following areas:
a. assessment methods, including percentage of
disfluent
syllables,
identification of types of disfluencies, identification
of
secondary features, identification of attitudes and emotions
related
to stuttering
b. pseudostuttering and its use in intervention
c. selected fluency shaping techniques
d. selected stuttering modification techniques
[IV-G 1; IV-G 2; IV-G 3]
7)
demonstrate knowledge of specialty recognition and the ASHA code of ethics as
it applies to the management of fluency disorders. [III-E; III-H]
TEXTS:
Chmela,
K. A., & Reardon, N. (2001). The school-age child who stutters:
Working effectively with attitudes and emotionsŠA workbook. Memphis, TN:
Stuttering Foundation of America.
Jezer,
M. (1997). Stuttering: A life bound up in words. Brattleboro, Vermont:
Small Pond Press.
Manning,
W. H. (2001). Clinical decision making in fluency disorders, 2nd Ed. Vancouver,
Canada: Singular/Thompson Learning.
COURSE
OUTLINE:
Date Topic Reading
Assignment
1/17 Overview terms
& theories,
clinician competencies
1/24 Review of Characteristics Ch.
1, 2, 3 M begin PS
assgn. and
Definitions ASHA guidelines
1/31 Theories:
Etiology Jezer Ch. 1-8 Jezer reflections #1
Onset
& Development
2/7 Mini-Exam Ch. 4 & 5 M Assessment
2/14 Assessment (cont.) Jezer Ch.
9-17 Jezer refl. #2
2/21 Treatment Ch. 6
M Pseudostuttering Journal, Pt. 1 2/28 Mini-Exam
Counseling
Strategies Ch. 7
M
3/6 Treating Adults and
Adolescents Ch. 8 M
3/13, 20 Spring Break – No Class
3/27 Adults & Adolescents (cont.) Jezer Ch
18-26
Jezer-reflection & summary
4/3 Mini-Exam
Adults and Adolescents
(cont.)
4/10 Guest Speaker
4/17 Treating Preschool Ch. 9
M ISAD paper
&
School-age Children
4/24 Preschool & School-age Children SFA Wkbk
Ch
1-4 Mini-Exam
5/1 Preschool & School-age
Children PS #2
due
5/8 Indicators of Progress in Therapy Ch.
10 & 11 M
Progress
Following Treatment
FINAL EXAM – take
home; due Monday, May 12th by 3:00 p.m.
INSTRUCTIONAL
METHODS: A
seminar is defined as "a group of advanced students studying under a
professor with each doing original research and all exchanging results through
reports and discussions" (Merriam-Webster, 2002). Therefore, it is assumed
that all students will come to each class having read materials appropriate to
the topic of the class, and being prepared to discuss the information gathered.
While some lecture will be incorporated into the class, it is expected that
students will participate regularly through in-class discussion, as well as by
bringing resources obtained from their independent research.
COURSE
REQUIREMENTS:
Students are expected to be present for all class
meetings. Participation is expected in class discussions. Therefore,
students are to come to class having read assigned material and with any
pertinent material resulting from student research outside of class on the
topic(s). Periodic quizzes will be given, and assignments will include group
and individual written work and/or projects. All written work will be
evaluated on grammar, organization and spelling, in addition to content. Points
will be deducted for late assignments at the rate of 10 percent per day/class
after the due date.
Specific
assignments include:
1.
Each student will participate in a practical assignment during which you will
accomplish two goals. The first is to learn how to pseudostutter, so that
you can produce both the core and secondary features of stuttering and gain
some experience with stuttering in public. The second goal is for you to
learn how to produce several of the target behaviors that are used in
stuttering therapy. Detailed instructions for this assignment will be
provided. You will keep a journal for the duration of the assignment. The
part of your journal pertaining to pseudostuttering will be turned in at
the beginning of class on 2/21/08. The second part of your journal, relating to your use of
target behaviors, will be turned in on 5/1/08. Each part of this assignment will be graded based on a
total of 50 possible points. [III-C, III-D, IV-G 1, 2 & 3]
2.
You will be reading the text, Stuttering: A life bound up in words, over
the course of the semester. You are to turn in a response paper for each
of several sections of the book, as indicated on your syllabus on the class
outline section, elaborating on what you have learned through your reading.
Along with your final response paper, you will turn in an additional response
paper, summarizing what you believe are the major aspects about stuttering that
you have learned from this book, and how you believe the book will impact you
as a future clinician. What do you believe are the most important points to
include in a fluency evaluation? What does Jezer say to you about the
value/benefit of fluency treatment?
Each
1 page response is worth up to 10 pts.; the summary paper is worth up to 15
pts.
[III-G;
IV-G]
3.
Students will each select and read six papers from the International Stuttering
Awareness Day Conferences 2005, 2006 or 2007. These may be accessed on The
Stuttering Homepage at the following URL:
http://www.mnsu.edu/comdis/kuster/stutter.html. You may select papers from the
areas marked "Research about Stuttering" and "Treatment
Information and Issues". If you select "clinical nuggets", then
all papers under that heading are considered as a single paper. Write a paper
of approximately 3-4 pages. At the beginning, include a list of the six
articles selected. Your paper is to address the primary lessons that you learned
from these papers, including how you anticipate using these in your practice of
speech-language pathology. (20 pts.) [III-G]
4.
Individual and/or small group assignments, which may include presentations of
information from assigned readings or from your own independent research.
Some of these assignments will be graded, while others will not.
5.
Periodic short exams will be scheduled throughout the semester. A
comprehensive final exam will be given at the end of the semester.
EVALUATION
AND GRADING: The
final grade will be determined based on the percentage of total points
accumulated over the semester. The grading scale includes the standard division
for plus-minus letter grades ³A² through ³C² (e.g., "A" ranges from
90-100%, "B" from 80-89%, etc.). Since there is no ³D²
letter grade at the graduate level, an accumulation of less than 70% of the
total points will result in a grade of ³F².
KASA
Criteria:
Students
must receive a grade of C or higher on any assignment or exam which satisfies
one or more of the certification standards of the American
Speech-Language-Hearing Association. If a grade of C- or below is earned, the
student will need to initiate a remediation process in order to demonstrate
acquisition of the skill or knowledge indicator associated with the low grade.
The student will work with the course instructor, advisor, program director
and/or department chair to address the deficiency. This process is explained in
detail in the department manual.
ACADEMIC
DISHONESTY:
The
university community relies upon academic honesty, which requires that words
and ideas that students present as their own truly represent their own work.
Plagiarism, defined as using another writer's ideas or expressions without
adequate acknowledgment, undermines the very foundation of education, which is
a quest for the truth. Often plagiarism occurs because students do not
understand the boundaries of legitimate scholarship. In brief, the honest use
of research material requires that writers:
1. Use quotation marks around (or
indent) words of another writer and cite the source of these words;
2. Cite the source of paraphrased
material, even when the paraphrase differs substantially from the original;
3. Attribute to their sources ideas
of other writers.
A handbook on writing research papers will provide
writers with detailed information on citation of sources. The APA Publication
Manual includes examples of plagiarism.
Cheating is a purposeful deception in the preparation
and/or submission of papers and assignments and the taking of exams, tests, or
quizzes. While individual instructors will set specific policies regarding
cheating, in general students can expect to receive a zero on an assignment,
exam, test or quiz, and perhaps fail a course when cheating has occurred.
NOTE: This syllabus is subject to change at the discretion of the instructor to accommodate instructional and/or student needs. It is the student's responsibility to make note of any announced changes.