Minnesota State University, Mankato
October 6, 2004
Kris Kaplan, Assistant General Counsel
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Office of the Chancellor
Email: Kristine Kaplan Phone: 651-296-3905
It is the law – and has been since 1974. State employees who create and handle education records every day must understand their roles in maintaining education records in accordance with federal and state data privacy laws.
Moreover, it is important for the integrity of the MnSCU system that we honor students´ rights to access and maintain privacy in the education records that are entrusted to us.
Education records are data maintained by the school (or an agent or employee acting in his/her official capacity) that directly relate to an individually identifiable student.
Certain information is exempted from the definition of "education record"
Most education records are "private" as to the subject student, which means:
"Directory Data" is public and available to anyone.
Directory Data is defined differently at each school. Some information is NEVER public: SSN, Student ID Number, race, ethnicity, gender and similar information.
Directory data at MSUM is defined as:
Do not automatically assume you can release directory data.
Students have the right to refuse the disclosure of their data. This must be honored in all contexts – not limited to omission from student directory. Consult the Registrar for information on whether students have "opted out."
Be careful about releasing directory data that indirectly reveals private information.
e.g., school officials could not respond to a request for a list of names of "all African American computer science majors" even though names and majors are "directory".
The primary rights include:
In Minnesota, students´ rights in their education records begin upon application and generally continue post-attendance (private data remains private after student leaves).
All students in higher education have the same rights regardless of their age.
International students have the same privacy rights except that the CIS (f.k.a. INS) gets access to certain information without specific consent.
State employees have a legal responsibility to protect the privacy of student educational records under their control, including access within the institution. Need-to-know is the basic principle.
Limit your access to what is necessary for your work – your technical ability to access data may be broader than your legal authority.
If you are not clear about another employee´s right to access student information, ask them to explain. Curiosity is not a "legitimate educational interest". Limit the disclosure to what is really necessary to perform the job.
Be careful about inappropriate re-disclosure – including inadvertent viewing on desktops or computer screens or oral disclosures to colleagues who don´t have legitimate educational interest.
Keep copies of applicable policies/procedures handy, including
Know who to call for assistance. Every campus has a Data Practices Compliance Official who can help answer questions. For example, Carol Stallkamp can answer questions at MSU.
Collect private data only as necessary. Restrict use of SSN or other personal identifiers.
When collecting private data from students, must give Data Practices Notice ("Tennessen Warning"):
Notice may be oral, but written is better record.
Keep private data secure – the laws apply to your handling of data wherever located.
In the workplace
Social security numbers and medical data especially sensitive.
No portion of student´s SSN may be used for public identification, including, for example, posting of grades.
Before releasing data on one student always check to be sure it doesn’t improperly contain data on others.
To students who are subjects of data (under MGDPA within ten working days). Laws do not require written request – MSUM FERPA Notice suggests that students submit written request to appropriate school official who maintains records.
To parents:
To third parties – e.g., press, unions, law enforcement, other students, potential employers:
prior, written consent of student generally required that meets the following standards:
A release that does not include all the above requirements is not valid and cannot be honored. If that happens, provide a substitute, valid form.
A faxed release is okay if signed and dated. An e-mail "authorization" is not okay is needs a signature. Electronic signatures were recently approved for giving written consent where required under FERPA, but stringent standards must be met.
To third parties without consent as authorized by law. e.g., to organizations auditing school programs or Student Financial Services; for health or safety emergency (imminent danger required); in response to valid subpoena or court order, and other exceptions:
If in doubt, consult – in almost every case immediate response is not required.
Always refer legal process or law enforcement requests to DPCO. Responding to court orders or subpoenas requires special procedures, including notice to student, in most cases. Child support enforcement officials must obtain subpoena for private student data.
Consult school policy/procedures for whether written request required and whether/how to charge for copies of information, if requested.
In person
If served with a search warrant, obtain ID of official and a copy of the warrant; cooperate with search and notify the OGC or AGO as soon as practical.
In other cases: Ask for student´s written release – check to make sure it complies with requirements described above; ask for ID of requesting party.
If no release, may provide only directory information (so long as student has not "opted out") unless there is specific legal authority to release.
If legal authority is claimed, ask what it is and for a copy of the law, if possible. Limit disclosure to what the law requires &ndash government officials who need more can obtain subpoenas.
If a health or safety emergency is claimed, establish reasonable basis that there is imminent danger of physical harm to the student or others – if not, do not give out private data (including class schedules or locations) but may agree to appropriate assistance.
By telephone
By fax or e-mail
Sending private data by these means is arguably more risky than U.S. Mail as you have less assurance of who has access at the receiving end, especially to third parties. Take reasonable security precautions, including following any IT standards regarding electronic transmissions. May call to verify fax receipt.
Using a Web site to disseminate private student data is acceptable for students to access their own data by use of a confidential PIN number on a secure Web application.